That was misleading. The problem won't happen with 0.9.6a anyway.
[openssl.git] / crypto / opensslv.h
index 938fc80b7ed27745a410c8b26d0e1cd505a3eb25..8ce9b2dc4a9efbcd248428721720d1885d23de28 100644 (file)
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
  * (Prior to 0.9.5a beta1, a different scheme was used: MMNNFFRBB for
  *  major minor fix final patch/beta)
  */
-#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x00906002L
-#define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT   "OpenSSL 0.9.6-beta2 17 Sep 2000"
+#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x00907000L
+#define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT   "OpenSSL 0.9.7-dev 24 Sep 2000"
 #define OPENSSL_VERSION_PTEXT  " part of " OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT
 
 
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
  * should only keep the versions that are binary compatible with the current.
  */
 #define SHLIB_VERSION_HISTORY ""
-#define SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER "0.9.6"
+#define SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER "0.9.7"
 
 
 #endif /* HEADER_OPENSSLV_H */