From: Matt Caswell Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:56:28 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Add a test for small subgroup attacks on DH/DHE X-Git-Tag: OpenSSL_1_1_0-pre3~391 X-Git-Url: https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=e729aac19de7b41169be82e6e55c4c898de9470a Add a test for small subgroup attacks on DH/DHE Following on from the previous commit, add a test to ensure that DH_compute_key correctly fails if passed a bad y such that: y^q (mod p) != 1 Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni --- diff --git a/test/dhtest.c b/test/dhtest.c index 36bac32c15..224b1fdee8 100644 --- a/test/dhtest.c +++ b/test/dhtest.c @@ -454,6 +454,31 @@ static const unsigned char dhtest_2048_256_Z[] = { 0xC2, 0x6C, 0x5D, 0x7C }; +static const unsigned char dhtest_rfc5114_2048_224_bad_y[] = { + 0x45, 0x32, 0x5F, 0x51, 0x07, 0xE5, 0xDF, 0x1C, 0xD6, 0x02, 0x82, 0xB3, + 0x32, 0x8F, 0xA4, 0x0F, 0x87, 0xB8, 0x41, 0xFE, 0xB9, 0x35, 0xDE, 0xAD, + 0xC6, 0x26, 0x85, 0xB4, 0xFF, 0x94, 0x8C, 0x12, 0x4C, 0xBF, 0x5B, 0x20, + 0xC4, 0x46, 0xA3, 0x26, 0xEB, 0xA4, 0x25, 0xB7, 0x68, 0x8E, 0xCC, 0x67, + 0xBA, 0xEA, 0x58, 0xD0, 0xF2, 0xE9, 0xD2, 0x24, 0x72, 0x60, 0xDA, 0x88, + 0x18, 0x9C, 0xE0, 0x31, 0x6A, 0xAD, 0x50, 0x6D, 0x94, 0x35, 0x8B, 0x83, + 0x4A, 0x6E, 0xFA, 0x48, 0x73, 0x0F, 0x83, 0x87, 0xFF, 0x6B, 0x66, 0x1F, + 0xA8, 0x82, 0xC6, 0x01, 0xE5, 0x80, 0xB5, 0xB0, 0x52, 0xD0, 0xE9, 0xD8, + 0x72, 0xF9, 0x7D, 0x5B, 0x8B, 0xA5, 0x4C, 0xA5, 0x25, 0x95, 0x74, 0xE2, + 0x7A, 0x61, 0x4E, 0xA7, 0x8F, 0x12, 0xE2, 0xD2, 0x9D, 0x8C, 0x02, 0x70, + 0x34, 0x44, 0x32, 0xC7, 0xB2, 0xF3, 0xB9, 0xFE, 0x17, 0x2B, 0xD6, 0x1F, + 0x8B, 0x7E, 0x4A, 0xFA, 0xA3, 0xB5, 0x3E, 0x7A, 0x81, 0x9A, 0x33, 0x66, + 0x62, 0xA4, 0x50, 0x18, 0x3E, 0xA2, 0x5F, 0x00, 0x07, 0xD8, 0x9B, 0x22, + 0xE4, 0xEC, 0x84, 0xD5, 0xEB, 0x5A, 0xF3, 0x2A, 0x31, 0x23, 0xD8, 0x44, + 0x22, 0x2A, 0x8B, 0x37, 0x44, 0xCC, 0xC6, 0x87, 0x4B, 0xBE, 0x50, 0x9D, + 0x4A, 0xC4, 0x8E, 0x45, 0xCF, 0x72, 0x4D, 0xC0, 0x89, 0xB3, 0x72, 0xED, + 0x33, 0x2C, 0xBC, 0x7F, 0x16, 0x39, 0x3B, 0xEB, 0xD2, 0xDD, 0xA8, 0x01, + 0x73, 0x84, 0x62, 0xB9, 0x29, 0xD2, 0xC9, 0x51, 0x32, 0x9E, 0x7A, 0x6A, + 0xCF, 0xC1, 0x0A, 0xDB, 0x0E, 0xE0, 0x62, 0x77, 0x6F, 0x59, 0x62, 0x72, + 0x5A, 0x69, 0xA6, 0x5B, 0x70, 0xCA, 0x65, 0xC4, 0x95, 0x6F, 0x9A, 0xC2, + 0xDF, 0x72, 0x6D, 0xB1, 0x1E, 0x54, 0x7B, 0x51, 0xB4, 0xEF, 0x7F, 0x89, + 0x93, 0x74, 0x89, 0x59 +}; + typedef struct { DH *(*get_param) (void); const unsigned char *xA; @@ -491,12 +516,9 @@ static int run_rfc5114_tests(void) unsigned char *Z1 = NULL; unsigned char *Z2 = NULL; const rfc5114_td *td = NULL; + BIGNUM *bady = NULL; for (i = 0; i < (int)OSSL_NELEM(rfctd); i++) { - dhA = NULL; - dhB = NULL; - Z1 = NULL; - Z2 = NULL; td = rfctd + i; /* Set up DH structures setting key components */ dhA = td->get_param(); @@ -542,10 +564,48 @@ static int run_rfc5114_tests(void) DH_free(dhB); OPENSSL_free(Z1); OPENSSL_free(Z2); + dhA = NULL; + dhB = NULL; + Z1 = NULL; + Z2 = NULL; + } + /* Now i == OSSL_NELEM(rfctd) */ + /* RFC5114 uses unsafe primes, so now test an invalid y value */ + dhA = DH_get_2048_224(); + if (dhA == NULL) + goto bad_err; + Z1 = OPENSSL_malloc(DH_size(dhA)); + if (Z1 == NULL) + goto bad_err; + + bady = BN_bin2bn(dhtest_rfc5114_2048_224_bad_y, + sizeof(dhtest_rfc5114_2048_224_bad_y), NULL); + if (bady == NULL) + goto bad_err; + + if (!DH_generate_key(dhA)) + goto bad_err; + + if (DH_compute_key(Z1, bady, dhA) != -1) { + /* + * DH_compute_key should fail with -1. If we get here we unexpectedly + * allowed an invalid y value + */ + goto err; } + /* We'll have a stale error on the queue from the above test so clear it */ + ERR_clear_error(); + + printf("RFC5114 parameter test %d OK\n", i + 1); + + BN_free(bady); + DH_free(dhA); + OPENSSL_free(Z1); + return 1; bad_err: + BN_free(bady); DH_free(dhA); DH_free(dhB); OPENSSL_free(Z1); @@ -555,6 +615,7 @@ static int run_rfc5114_tests(void) ERR_print_errors_fp(stderr); return 0; err: + BN_free(bady); DH_free(dhA); DH_free(dhB); OPENSSL_free(Z1);