From: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 08:38:23 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Skipping all tests just because one algorithm is disabled seems a bit harsch.
X-Git-Tag: OpenSSL_0_9_8-beta5~14
X-Git-Url: https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=49e96badcf7f81bc538cb7540d9097c204f20ad5

Skipping all tests just because one algorithm is disabled seems a bit harsch.

PR: 1089
---

diff --git a/util/selftest.pl b/util/selftest.pl
index e9d5aa8938..736eacb11e 100644
--- a/util/selftest.pl
+++ b/util/selftest.pl
@@ -130,15 +130,21 @@ if (system("make 2>&1 | tee make.log") > 255) {
     goto err;
 }
 
-$_=$options;
-s/no-asm//;
-s/no-shared//;
-s/no-krb5//;
-if (/no-/)
-{
-    print OUT "Test skipped.\n";
-    goto err;
-}
+# Not sure why this is here.  The tests themselves can detect if their
+# particular feature isn't included, and should therefore skip themselves.
+# To skip *all* tests just because one algorithm isn't included is like
+# shooting mosquito with an elephant gun...
+#                   -- Richard Levitte, inspired by problem report 1089
+#
+#$_=$options;
+#s/no-asm//;
+#s/no-shared//;
+#s/no-krb5//;
+#if (/no-/)
+#{
+#    print OUT "Test skipped.\n";
+#    goto err;
+#}
 
 print "Running make test...\n";
 if (system("make test 2>&1 | tee maketest.log") > 255)