X-Git-Url: https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=FAQ;h=1b129bc5ac8bbf977ff5a8246f1a6a568f001f21;hp=78018fc8fed88b546ed313b7115a52a8e1f4095c;hb=08a54f6e6a2bf705eb26489e2023b53e1e99607d;hpb=299e7c91459b2ed74d786e3ed12a9a48bbd929f1 diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ index 78018fc8fe..1b129bc5ac 100644 --- a/FAQ +++ b/FAQ @@ -1,20 +1,74 @@ OpenSSL - Frequently Asked Questions -------------------------------------- +[MISC] Miscellaneous questions + * Which is the current version of OpenSSL? * Where is the documentation? * How can I contact the OpenSSL developers? +* Where can I get a compiled version of OpenSSL? +* Why aren't tools like 'autoconf' and 'libtool' used? +* What is an 'engine' version? +* How do I check the authenticity of the OpenSSL distribution? + +[LEGAL] Legal questions + * Do I need patent licenses to use OpenSSL? -* Is OpenSSL thread-safe? +* Can I use OpenSSL with GPL software? + +[USER] Questions on using the OpenSSL applications + * Why do I get a "PRNG not seeded" error message? +* Why do I get an "unable to write 'random state'" error message? +* How do I create certificates or certificate requests? +* Why can't I create certificate requests? +* Why does fail with a certificate verify error? +* Why can I only use weak ciphers when I connect to a server using OpenSSL? +* How can I create DSA certificates? +* Why can't I make an SSL connection using a DSA certificate? +* How can I remove the passphrase on a private key? +* Why can't I use OpenSSL certificates with SSL client authentication? +* Why does my browser give a warning about a mismatched hostname? +* How do I install a CA certificate into a browser? +* Why is OpenSSL x509 DN output not conformant to RFC2253? + +[BUILD] Questions about building and testing OpenSSL + * Why does the linker complain about undefined symbols? -* Where can I get a compiled version of OpenSSL? +* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: command not found"? +* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented"? +* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: stack empty"? +* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Alpha Tru64 Unix? +* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail with "ar: command not found"? +* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Win32 with VC++? +* What is special about OpenSSL on Redhat? +* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on MacOS X? +* Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail on MacOS X? +* Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in BN_sqr test [on a 64-bit platform]? +* Why does OpenBSD-i386 build fail on des-586.s with "Unimplemented segment type"? + +[PROG] Questions about programming with OpenSSL + +* Is OpenSSL thread-safe? +* I've compiled a program under Windows and it crashes: why? +* How do I read or write a DER encoded buffer using the ASN1 functions? +* I've tried using and I get errors why? +* I've called and it fails, why? +* I just get a load of numbers for the error output, what do they mean? +* Why do I get errors about unknown algorithms? +* Why can't the OpenSSH configure script detect OpenSSL? +* Can I use OpenSSL's SSL library with non-blocking I/O? +* Why doesn't my server application receive a client certificate? +* Why does compilation fail due to an undefined symbol NID_uniqueIdentifier? + +=============================================================================== +[MISC] ======================================================================== * Which is the current version of OpenSSL? The current version is available from . -OpenSSL 0.9.5 was released on February 28th, 2000. +OpenSSL 0.9.7a was released on February 19, 2003. In addition to the current stable release, you can also access daily snapshots of the OpenSSL development version at . +* Where can I get a compiled version of OpenSSL? + +Some applications that use OpenSSL are distributed in binary form. +When using such an application, you don't need to install OpenSSL +yourself; the application will include the required parts (e.g. DLLs). + +If you want to install OpenSSL on a Windows system and you don't have +a C compiler, read the "Mingw32" section of INSTALL.W32 for information +on how to obtain and install the free GNU C compiler. + +A number of Linux and *BSD distributions include OpenSSL. + + +* Why aren't tools like 'autoconf' and 'libtool' used? + +autoconf will probably be used in future OpenSSL versions. If it was +less Unix-centric, it might have been used much earlier. + +* What is an 'engine' version? + +With version 0.9.6 OpenSSL was extended to interface to external crypto +hardware. This was realized in a special release '0.9.6-engine'. With +version 0.9.7 (not yet released) the changes were merged into the main +development line, so that the special release is no longer necessary. + +* How do I check the authenticity of the OpenSSL distribution? + +We provide MD5 digests and ASC signatures of each tarball. +Use MD5 to check that a tarball from a mirror site is identical: + + md5sum TARBALL | awk '{print $1;}' | cmp - TARBALL.md5 + +You can check authenticity using pgp or gpg. You need the OpenSSL team +member public key used to sign it (download it from a key server). Then +just do: + + pgp TARBALL.asc + +[LEGAL] ======================================================================= + * Do I need patent licenses to use OpenSSL? The patents section of the README file lists patents that may apply to @@ -70,50 +164,221 @@ offer legal advice. You can configure OpenSSL so as not to use RC5 and IDEA by using ./config no-rc5 no-idea -Until the RSA patent expires, U.S. users may want to use - ./config no-rc5 no-idea no-rsa -Please note that you will *not* be able to communicate with most of -the popular web browsers without RSA support. +* Can I use OpenSSL with GPL software? +On many systems including the major Linux and BSD distributions, yes (the +GPL does not place restrictions on using libraries that are part of the +normal operating system distribution). -* Is OpenSSL thread-safe? +On other systems, the situation is less clear. Some GPL software copyright +holders claim that you infringe on their rights if you use OpenSSL with +their software on operating systems that don't normally include OpenSSL. -Yes (with limitations: an SSL connection may not concurrently be used -by multiple threads). On Windows and many Unix systems, OpenSSL -automatically uses the multi-threaded versions of the standard -libraries. If your platform is not one of these, consult the INSTALL -file. +If you develop open source software that uses OpenSSL, you may find it +useful to choose an other license than the GPL, or state explicitly that +"This program is released under the GPL with the additional exemption that +compiling, linking, and/or using OpenSSL is allowed." If you are using +GPL software developed by others, you may want to ask the copyright holder +for permission to use their software with OpenSSL. -Multi-threaded applications must provide two callback functions to -OpenSSL. This is described in the threads(3) manpage. +[USER] ======================================================================== * Why do I get a "PRNG not seeded" error message? Cryptographic software needs a source of unpredictable data to work correctly. Many open source operating systems provide a "randomness -device" that serves this purpose. On other systems, applications have -to call the RAND_add() or RAND_seed() function with appropriate data -before generating keys or performing public key encryption. - -Some broken applications do not do this. As of version 0.9.5, the -OpenSSL functions that need randomness report an error if the random -number generator has not been seeded with at least 128 bits of -randomness. If this error occurs, please contact the author of the -application you are using. It is likely that it never worked -correctly. OpenSSL 0.9.5 makes the error visible by refusing to -perform potentially insecure encryption. - -Most components of the openssl command line tool try to use the -file $HOME/.rnd (or $RANDFILE, if this environment variable is set) -for seeding the PRNG. If this file does not exist or is too short, -the "PRNG not seeded" error message may occur. -Note that the command "openssl rsa" in OpenSSL 0.9.5 does not do this -and will fail on systems without /dev/urandom when trying to -password-encrypt an RSA key! This is a bug in the library; -try a later snaphost instead. +device" (/dev/urandom or /dev/random) that serves this purpose. +All OpenSSL versions try to use /dev/urandom by default; starting with +version 0.9.7, OpenSSL also tries /dev/random if /dev/urandom is not +available. + +On other systems, applications have to call the RAND_add() or +RAND_seed() function with appropriate data before generating keys or +performing public key encryption. (These functions initialize the +pseudo-random number generator, PRNG.) Some broken applications do +not do this. As of version 0.9.5, the OpenSSL functions that need +randomness report an error if the random number generator has not been +seeded with at least 128 bits of randomness. If this error occurs and +is not discussed in the documentation of the application you are +using, please contact the author of that application; it is likely +that it never worked correctly. OpenSSL 0.9.5 and later make the +error visible by refusing to perform potentially insecure encryption. + +If you are using Solaris 8, you can add /dev/urandom and /dev/random +devices by installing patch 112438 (Sparc) or 112439 (x86), which are +available via the Patchfinder at +(Solaris 9 includes these devices by default). For /dev/random support +for earlier Solaris versions, see Sun's statement at + +(the SUNWski package is available in patch 105710). + +On systems without /dev/urandom and /dev/random, it is a good idea to +use the Entropy Gathering Demon (EGD); see the RAND_egd() manpage for +details. Starting with version 0.9.7, OpenSSL will automatically look +for an EGD socket at /var/run/egd-pool, /dev/egd-pool, /etc/egd-pool and +/etc/entropy. + +Most components of the openssl command line utility automatically try +to seed the random number generator from a file. The name of the +default seeding file is determined as follows: If environment variable +RANDFILE is set, then it names the seeding file. Otherwise if +environment variable HOME is set, then the seeding file is $HOME/.rnd. +If neither RANDFILE nor HOME is set, versions up to OpenSSL 0.9.6 will +use file .rnd in the current directory while OpenSSL 0.9.6a uses no +default seeding file at all. OpenSSL 0.9.6b and later will behave +similarly to 0.9.6a, but will use a default of "C:\" for HOME on +Windows systems if the environment variable has not been set. + +If the default seeding file does not exist or is too short, the "PRNG +not seeded" error message may occur. + +The openssl command line utility will write back a new state to the +default seeding file (and create this file if necessary) unless +there was no sufficient seeding. + +Pointing $RANDFILE to an Entropy Gathering Daemon socket does not work. +Use the "-rand" option of the OpenSSL command line tools instead. +The $RANDFILE environment variable and $HOME/.rnd are only used by the +OpenSSL command line tools. Applications using the OpenSSL library +provide their own configuration options to specify the entropy source, +please check out the documentation coming the with application. + + +* Why do I get an "unable to write 'random state'" error message? + + +Sometimes the openssl command line utility does not abort with +a "PRNG not seeded" error message, but complains that it is +"unable to write 'random state'". This message refers to the +default seeding file (see previous answer). A possible reason +is that no default filename is known because neither RANDFILE +nor HOME is set. (Versions up to 0.9.6 used file ".rnd" in the +current directory in this case, but this has changed with 0.9.6a.) + + +* How do I create certificates or certificate requests? + +Check out the CA.pl(1) manual page. This provides a simple wrapper round +the 'req', 'verify', 'ca' and 'pkcs12' utilities. For finer control check +out the manual pages for the individual utilities and the certificate +extensions documentation (currently in doc/openssl.txt). + + +* Why can't I create certificate requests? + +You typically get the error: + + unable to find 'distinguished_name' in config + problems making Certificate Request + +This is because it can't find the configuration file. Check out the +DIAGNOSTICS section of req(1) for more information. + + +* Why does fail with a certificate verify error? + +This problem is usually indicated by log messages saying something like +"unable to get local issuer certificate" or "self signed certificate". +When a certificate is verified its root CA must be "trusted" by OpenSSL +this typically means that the CA certificate must be placed in a directory +or file and the relevant program configured to read it. The OpenSSL program +'verify' behaves in a similar way and issues similar error messages: check +the verify(1) program manual page for more information. + + +* Why can I only use weak ciphers when I connect to a server using OpenSSL? + +This is almost certainly because you are using an old "export grade" browser +which only supports weak encryption. Upgrade your browser to support 128 bit +ciphers. + + +* How can I create DSA certificates? + +Check the CA.pl(1) manual page for a DSA certificate example. + + +* Why can't I make an SSL connection to a server using a DSA certificate? + +Typically you'll see a message saying there are no shared ciphers when +the same setup works fine with an RSA certificate. There are two possible +causes. The client may not support connections to DSA servers most web +browsers (including Netscape and MSIE) only support connections to servers +supporting RSA cipher suites. The other cause is that a set of DH parameters +has not been supplied to the server. DH parameters can be created with the +dhparam(1) command and loaded using the SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh() for example: +check the source to s_server in apps/s_server.c for an example. + + +* How can I remove the passphrase on a private key? + +Firstly you should be really *really* sure you want to do this. Leaving +a private key unencrypted is a major security risk. If you decide that +you do have to do this check the EXAMPLES sections of the rsa(1) and +dsa(1) manual pages. + + +* Why can't I use OpenSSL certificates with SSL client authentication? + +What will typically happen is that when a server requests authentication +it will either not include your certificate or tell you that you have +no client certificates (Netscape) or present you with an empty list box +(MSIE). The reason for this is that when a server requests a client +certificate it includes a list of CAs names which it will accept. Browsers +will only let you select certificates from the list on the grounds that +there is little point presenting a certificate which the server will +reject. + +The solution is to add the relevant CA certificate to your servers "trusted +CA list". How you do this depends on the server software in uses. You can +print out the servers list of acceptable CAs using the OpenSSL s_client tool: + +openssl s_client -connect www.some.host:443 -prexit + +If your server only requests certificates on certain URLs then you may need +to manually issue an HTTP GET command to get the list when s_client connects: + +GET /some/page/needing/a/certificate.html + +If your CA does not appear in the list then this confirms the problem. + + +* Why does my browser give a warning about a mismatched hostname? + +Browsers expect the server's hostname to match the value in the commonName +(CN) field of the certificate. If it does not then you get a warning. + + +* How do I install a CA certificate into a browser? + +The usual way is to send the DER encoded certificate to the browser as +MIME type application/x-x509-ca-cert, for example by clicking on an appropriate +link. On MSIE certain extensions such as .der or .cacert may also work, or you +can import the certificate using the certificate import wizard. + +You can convert a certificate to DER form using the command: +openssl x509 -in ca.pem -outform DER -out ca.der + +Occasionally someone suggests using a command such as: + +openssl pkcs12 -export -out cacert.p12 -in cacert.pem -inkey cakey.pem + +DO NOT DO THIS! This command will give away your CAs private key and +reduces its security to zero: allowing anyone to forge certificates in +whatever name they choose. + +* Why is OpenSSL x509 DN output not conformant to RFC2253? + +The ways to print out the oneline format of the DN (Distinguished Name) have +been extended in version 0.9.7 of OpenSSL. Using the new X509_NAME_print_ex() +interface, the "-nameopt" option could be introduded. See the manual +page of the "openssl x509" commandline tool for details. The old behaviour +has however been left as default for the sake of compatibility. + +[BUILD] ======================================================================= * Why does the linker complain about undefined symbols? @@ -139,14 +404,363 @@ If none of these helps, you may want to try using the current snapshot. If the problem persists, please submit a bug report. -* Where can I get a compiled version of OpenSSL? +* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: command not found"? -Some applications that use OpenSSL are distributed in binary form. -When using such an application, you don't need to install OpenSSL -yourself; the application will include the required parts (e.g. DLLs). +You didn't install "bc", the Unix calculator. If you want to run the +tests, get GNU bc from ftp://ftp.gnu.org or from your OS distributor. -If you want to install OpenSSL on a Windows system and you don't have -a C compiler, read the "Mingw32" section of INSTALL.W32 for information -on how to obtain and install the free GNU C compiler. -A number of Linux and *BSD distributions include OpenSSL. +* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented"? + +On some SCO installations or versions, bc has a bug that gets triggered +when you run the test suite (using "make test"). The message returned is +"bc: 1 not implemented". + +The best way to deal with this is to find another implementation of bc +and compile/install it. GNU bc (see http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html +for download instructions) can be safely used, for example. + + +* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: stack empty"? + +On some DG/ux versions, bc seems to have a too small stack for calculations +that the OpenSSL bntest throws at it. This gets triggered when you run the +test suite (using "make test"). The message returned is "bc: stack empty". + +The best way to deal with this is to find another implementation of bc +and compile/install it. GNU bc (see http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html +for download instructions) can be safely used, for example. + + +* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Alpha Tru64 Unix? + +On some Alpha installations running Tru64 Unix and Compaq C, the compilation +of crypto/sha/sha_dgst.c fails with the message 'Fatal: Insufficient virtual +memory to continue compilation.' As far as the tests have shown, this may be +a compiler bug. What happens is that it eats up a lot of resident memory +to build something, probably a table. The problem is clearly in the +optimization code, because if one eliminates optimization completely (-O0), +the compilation goes through (and the compiler consumes about 2MB of resident +memory instead of 240MB or whatever one's limit is currently). + +There are three options to solve this problem: + +1. set your current data segment size soft limit higher. Experience shows +that about 241000 kbytes seems to be enough on an AlphaServer DS10. You do +this with the command 'ulimit -Sd nnnnnn', where 'nnnnnn' is the number of +kbytes to set the limit to. + +2. If you have a hard limit that is lower than what you need and you can't +get it changed, you can compile all of OpenSSL with -O0 as optimization +level. This is however not a very nice thing to do for those who expect to +get the best result from OpenSSL. A bit more complicated solution is the +following: + +----- snip:start ----- + make DIRS=crypto SDIRS=sha "`grep '^CFLAG=' Makefile.ssl | \ + sed -e 's/ -O[0-9] / -O0 /'`" + rm `ls crypto/*.o crypto/sha/*.o | grep -v 'sha_dgst\.o'` + make +----- snip:end ----- + +This will only compile sha_dgst.c with -O0, the rest with the optimization +level chosen by the configuration process. When the above is done, do the +test and installation and you're set. + + +* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail with "ar: command not found"? + +Getting this message is quite usual on Solaris 2, because Sun has hidden +away 'ar' and other development commands in directories that aren't in +$PATH by default. One of those directories is '/usr/ccs/bin'. The +quickest way to fix this is to do the following (it assumes you use sh +or any sh-compatible shell): + +----- snip:start ----- + PATH=${PATH}:/usr/ccs/bin; export PATH +----- snip:end ----- + +and then redo the compilation. What you should really do is make sure +'/usr/ccs/bin' is permanently in your $PATH, for example through your +'.profile' (again, assuming you use a sh-compatible shell). + + +* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Win32 with VC++? + +Sometimes, you may get reports from VC++ command line (cl) that it +can't find standard include files like stdio.h and other weirdnesses. +One possible cause is that the environment isn't correctly set up. +To solve that problem for VC++ versions up to 6, one should run +VCVARS32.BAT which is found in the 'bin' subdirectory of the VC++ +installation directory (somewhere under 'Program Files'). For VC++ +version 7 (and up?), which is also called VS.NET, the file is called +VSVARS32.BAT instead. +This needs to be done prior to running NMAKE, and the changes are only +valid for the current DOS session. + + +* What is special about OpenSSL on Redhat? + +Red Hat Linux (release 7.0 and later) include a preinstalled limited +version of OpenSSL. For patent reasons, support for IDEA, RC5 and MDC2 +is disabled in this version. The same may apply to other Linux distributions. +Users may therefore wish to install more or all of the features left out. + +To do this you MUST ensure that you do not overwrite the openssl that is in +/usr/bin on your Red Hat machine. Several packages depend on this file, +including sendmail and ssh. /usr/local/bin is a good alternative choice. The +libraries that come with Red Hat 7.0 onwards have different names and so are +not affected. (eg For Red Hat 7.2 they are /lib/libssl.so.0.9.6b and +/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6b with symlinks /lib/libssl.so.2 and +/lib/libcrypto.so.2 respectively). + +Please note that we have been advised by Red Hat attempting to recompile the +openssl rpm with all the cryptography enabled will not work. All other +packages depend on the original Red Hat supplied openssl package. It is also +worth noting that due to the way Red Hat supplies its packages, updates to +openssl on each distribution never change the package version, only the +build number. For example, on Red Hat 7.1, the latest openssl package has +version number 0.9.6 and build number 9 even though it contains all the +relevant updates in packages up to and including 0.9.6b. + +A possible way around this is to persuade Red Hat to produce a non-US +version of Red Hat Linux. + +FYI: Patent numbers and expiry dates of US patents: +MDC-2: 4,908,861 13/03/2007 +IDEA: 5,214,703 25/05/2010 +RC5: 5,724,428 03/03/2015 + + +* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on MacOS X? + +If the failure happens when trying to build the "openssl" binary, with +a large number of undefined symbols, it's very probable that you have +OpenSSL 0.9.6b delivered with the operating system (you can find out by +running '/usr/bin/openssl version') and that you were trying to build +OpenSSL 0.9.7 or newer. The problem is that the loader ('ld') in +MacOS X has a misfeature that's quite difficult to go around. +Look in the file PROBLEMS for a more detailed explanation and for possible +solutions. + + +* Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail on MacOS X? + +If the failure happens when running 'make test' and the RC4 test fails, +it's very probable that you have OpenSSL 0.9.6b delivered with the +operating system (you can find out by running '/usr/bin/openssl version') +and that you were trying to build OpenSSL 0.9.6d. The problem is that +the loader ('ld') in MacOS X has a misfeature that's quite difficult to +go around and has linked the programs "openssl" and the test programs +with /usr/lib/libcrypto.dylib and /usr/lib/libssl.dylib instead of the +libraries you just built. +Look in the file PROBLEMS for a more detailed explanation and for possible +solutions. + +* Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in BN_sqr test [on a 64-bit platform]? + +Failure in BN_sqr test is most likely caused by a failure to configure the +toolkit for current platform or lack of support for the platform in question. +Run './config -t' and './apps/openssl version -p'. Do these platform +identifiers match? If they don't, then you most likely failed to run +./config and you're hereby advised to do so before filing a bug report. +If ./config itself fails to run, then it's most likely problem with your +local environment and you should turn to your system administrator (or +similar). If identifiers match (and/or no alternative identifier is +suggested by ./config script), then the platform is unsupported. There might +or might not be a workaround. Most notably on SPARC64 platforms with GNU +C compiler you should be able to produce a working build by running +'./config -m32'. I understand that -m32 might not be what you want/need, +but the build should be operational. For further details turn to +. + +* Why does OpenBSD-i386 build fail on des-586.s with "Unimplemented segment type"? + +As of 0.9.7 assembler routines were overhauled for position independence +of the machine code, which is essential for shared library support. For +some reason OpenBSD is equipped with an out-of-date GNU assembler which +finds the new code offensive. To work around the problem, configure with +no-asm (and sacrifice a great deal of performance) or patch your assembler +according to . +For your convenience a pre-compiled replacement binary is provided at +. +Reportedly elder *BSD a.out platforms also suffer from this problem and +remedy should be same. Provided binary is statically linked and should be +working across wider range of *BSD branches, not just OpenBSD. + +[PROG] ======================================================================== + +* Is OpenSSL thread-safe? + +Yes (with limitations: an SSL connection may not concurrently be used +by multiple threads). On Windows and many Unix systems, OpenSSL +automatically uses the multi-threaded versions of the standard +libraries. If your platform is not one of these, consult the INSTALL +file. + +Multi-threaded applications must provide two callback functions to +OpenSSL. This is described in the threads(3) manpage. + + +* I've compiled a program under Windows and it crashes: why? + +This is usually because you've missed the comment in INSTALL.W32. +Your application must link against the same version of the Win32 +C-Runtime against which your openssl libraries were linked. The +default version for OpenSSL is /MD - "Multithreaded DLL". + +If you are using Microsoft Visual C++'s IDE (Visual Studio), in +many cases, your new project most likely defaulted to "Debug +Singlethreaded" - /ML. This is NOT interchangeable with /MD and your +program will crash, typically on the first BIO related read or write +operation. + +For each of the six possible link stage configurations within Win32, +your application must link against the same by which OpenSSL was +built. If you are using MS Visual C++ (Studio) this can be changed +by: + +1. Select Settings... from the Project Menu. +2. Select the C/C++ Tab. +3. Select "Code Generation from the "Category" drop down list box +4. Select the Appropriate library (see table below) from the "Use + run-time library" drop down list box. Perform this step for both + your debug and release versions of your application (look at the + top left of the settings panel to change between the two) + + Single Threaded /ML - MS VC++ often defaults to + this for the release + version of a new project. + Debug Single Threaded /MLd - MS VC++ often defaults to + this for the debug version + of a new project. + Multithreaded /MT + Debug Multithreaded /MTd + Multithreaded DLL /MD - OpenSSL defaults to this. + Debug Multithreaded DLL /MDd + +Note that debug and release libraries are NOT interchangeable. If you +built OpenSSL with /MD your application must use /MD and cannot use /MDd. + + +* How do I read or write a DER encoded buffer using the ASN1 functions? + +You have two options. You can either use a memory BIO in conjunction +with the i2d_XXX_bio() or d2i_XXX_bio() functions or you can use the +i2d_XXX(), d2i_XXX() functions directly. Since these are often the +cause of grief here are some code fragments using PKCS7 as an example: + +unsigned char *buf, *p; +int len; + +len = i2d_PKCS7(p7, NULL); +buf = OPENSSL_malloc(len); /* or Malloc, error checking omitted */ +p = buf; +i2d_PKCS7(p7, &p); + +At this point buf contains the len bytes of the DER encoding of +p7. + +The opposite assumes we already have len bytes in buf: + +unsigned char *p; +p = buf; +p7 = d2i_PKCS7(NULL, &p, len); + +At this point p7 contains a valid PKCS7 structure of NULL if an error +occurred. If an error occurred ERR_print_errors(bio) should give more +information. + +The reason for the temporary variable 'p' is that the ASN1 functions +increment the passed pointer so it is ready to read or write the next +structure. This is often a cause of problems: without the temporary +variable the buffer pointer is changed to point just after the data +that has been read or written. This may well be uninitialized data +and attempts to free the buffer will have unpredictable results +because it no longer points to the same address. + + +* I've tried using and I get errors why? + +This usually happens when you try compiling something using the PKCS#12 +macros with a C++ compiler. There is hardly ever any need to use the +PKCS#12 macros in a program, it is much easier to parse and create +PKCS#12 files using the PKCS12_parse() and PKCS12_create() functions +documented in doc/openssl.txt and with examples in demos/pkcs12. The +'pkcs12' application has to use the macros because it prints out +debugging information. + + +* I've called and it fails, why? + +Before submitting a report or asking in one of the mailing lists, you +should try to determine the cause. In particular, you should call +ERR_print_errors() or ERR_print_errors_fp() after the failed call +and see if the message helps. Note that the problem may occur earlier +than you think -- you should check for errors after every call where +it is possible, otherwise the actual problem may be hidden because +some OpenSSL functions clear the error state. + + +* I just get a load of numbers for the error output, what do they mean? + +The actual format is described in the ERR_print_errors() manual page. +You should call the function ERR_load_crypto_strings() before hand and +the message will be output in text form. If you can't do this (for example +it is a pre-compiled binary) you can use the errstr utility on the error +code itself (the hex digits after the second colon). + + +* Why do I get errors about unknown algorithms? + +This can happen under several circumstances such as reading in an +encrypted private key or attempting to decrypt a PKCS#12 file. The cause +is forgetting to load OpenSSL's table of algorithms with +OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms(). See the manual page for more information. + + +* Why can't the OpenSSH configure script detect OpenSSL? + +Several reasons for problems with the automatic detection exist. +OpenSSH requires at least version 0.9.5a of the OpenSSL libraries. +Sometimes the distribution has installed an older version in the system +locations that is detected instead of a new one installed. The OpenSSL +library might have been compiled for another CPU or another mode (32/64 bits). +Permissions might be wrong. + +The general answer is to check the config.log file generated when running +the OpenSSH configure script. It should contain the detailed information +on why the OpenSSL library was not detected or considered incompatible. + + +* Can I use OpenSSL's SSL library with non-blocking I/O? + +Yes; make sure to read the SSL_get_error(3) manual page! + +A pitfall to avoid: Don't assume that SSL_read() will just read from +the underlying transport or that SSL_write() will just write to it -- +it is also possible that SSL_write() cannot do any useful work until +there is data to read, or that SSL_read() cannot do anything until it +is possible to send data. One reason for this is that the peer may +request a new TLS/SSL handshake at any time during the protocol, +requiring a bi-directional message exchange; both SSL_read() and +SSL_write() will try to continue any pending handshake. + + +* Why doesn't my server application receive a client certificate? + +Due to the TLS protocol definition, a client will only send a certificate, +if explicitly asked by the server. Use the SSL_VERIFY_PEER flag of the +SSL_CTX_set_verify() function to enable the use of client certificates. + + +* Why does compilation fail due to an undefined symbol NID_uniqueIdentifier? + +For OpenSSL 0.9.7 the OID table was extended and corrected. In earlier +versions, uniqueIdentifier was incorrectly used for X.509 certificates. +The correct name according to RFC2256 (LDAP) is x500UniqueIdentifier. +Change your code to use the new name when compiling against OpenSSL 0.9.7. + + +=============================================================================== +