It was just pointed out to me that it's better to cast to double...

[openssl.git] / crypto / rand / md_rand.c

diff --git a/crypto/rand/md_rand.c b/crypto/rand/md_rand.c
index 841631d3cafcbf60553ea0e58255f9d987bffce8..87fd9455e2071fe43f0feb3260af8697d7830775 100644 (file)
--- a/crypto/rand/md_rand.c
+++ b/crypto/rand/md_rand.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
  * [including the GNU Public Licence.]
  */
 /* ====================================================================
- * Copyright (c) 1998-2000 The OpenSSL Project.  All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 1998-2001 The OpenSSL Project.  All rights reserved.
  *
  * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
  * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
@@ -177,10 +177,10 @@ RAND_METHOD *RAND_SSLeay(void)
 
 static void ssleay_rand_cleanup(void)
        {
-       memset(state,0,sizeof(state));
+       OPENSSL_cleanse(state,sizeof(state));
        state_num=0;
        state_index=0;
-       memset(md,0,MD_DIGEST_LENGTH);
+       OPENSSL_cleanse(md,MD_DIGEST_LENGTH);
        md_count[0]=0;
        md_count[1]=0;
        entropy=0;
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static void ssleay_rand_add(const void *buf, int num, double add)
         * other thread's seeding remains without effect (except for
         * the incremented counter).  By XORing it we keep at least as
         * much entropy as fits into md. */
-       for (k = 0; k < sizeof md; k++)
+       for (k = 0; k < (int)sizeof(md); k++)
                {
                md[k] ^= local_md[k];
                }
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static void ssleay_rand_add(const void *buf, int num, double add)
 
 static void ssleay_rand_seed(const void *buf, int num)
        {
-       ssleay_rand_add(buf, num, num);
+       ssleay_rand_add(buf, num, (double)num);
        }
 
 static int ssleay_rand_bytes(unsigned char *buf, int num)