Add Broadwell performance results.

[openssl.git] / crypto / modes / asm / ghash-x86_64.pl

diff --git a/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl b/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl
index ce7d1cb8baca6a6988aff9400d1f42240ab7de22..6e656ca13b8029cdf105cdd92df58b4e21d0d938 100644 (file)
--- a/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl
+++ b/crypto/modes/asm/ghash-x86_64.pl
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
 # Sandy Bridge 1.80(+8%)
 # Ivy Bridge   1.80(+7%)
 # Haswell      0.55(+93%) (if system doesn't support AVX)
+# Broadwell    0.45(+110%)(if system doesn't support AVX)
 # Bulldozer    1.49(+27%)
 # Silvermont   2.88(+13%)
 
@@ -73,7 +74,8 @@
 # CPUs such as Sandy and Ivy Bridge can execute it, the code performs
 # sub-optimally in comparison to above mentioned version. But thanks
 # to Ilya Albrekht and Max Locktyukhin of Intel Corp. we knew that
-# it performs in 0.41 cycles per byte on Haswell processor.
+# it performs in 0.41 cycles per byte on Haswell processor, and in
+# 0.29 on Broadwell.
 #
 # [1] http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2900&user=guest&pass=guest