Minor (final?) Makefiles polish.

[openssl.git] / FAQ

diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
index 06faf91a5e92f852c9bba06b91bbc01ba5df3ea1..86b6617f4479456b6bc9f6938a9079f0b538a8f2 100644 (file)
--- a/FAQ
+++ b/FAQ
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ OpenSSL  -  Frequently Asked Questions
 * Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail on MacOS X?
 * Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in BN_sqr test [on a 64-bit platform]?
 * Why does OpenBSD-i386 build fail on des-586.s with "Unimplemented segment type"?
+* Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in sha512t on x86 CPU?
+* Why does compiler fail to compile sha512.c?
 
 [PROG] Questions about programming with OpenSSL
 
@@ -141,8 +143,8 @@ less Unix-centric, it might have been used much earlier.
 
 With version 0.9.6 OpenSSL was extended to interface to external crypto
 hardware. This was realized in a special release '0.9.6-engine'. With
-version 0.9.7 (not yet released) the changes were merged into the main
-development line, so that the special release is no longer necessary.
+version 0.9.7 the changes were merged into the main development line,
+so that the special release is no longer necessary.
 
 * How do I check the authenticity of the OpenSSL distribution?
 
@@ -598,6 +600,23 @@ Reportedly elder *BSD a.out platforms also suffer from this problem and
 remedy should be same. Provided binary is statically linked and should be
 working across wider range of *BSD branches, not just OpenBSD.
 
+* Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in sha512t on x86 CPU?
+
+If the test program in question fails withs SIGILL, Illegal Instruction
+exception, then you more than likely to run SSE2-capable CPU, such as
+Intel P4, under control of kernel which does not support SSE2
+instruction extentions. See accompanying INSTALL file and
+OPENSSL_ia32cap(3) documentation page for further information.
+
+* Why does compiler fail to compile sha512.c?
+
+OpenSSL SHA-512 implementation depends on compiler support for 64-bit
+integer type. Few elder compilers [ULTRIX cc, SCO compiler to mention a
+couple] lack support for this and therefore are incapable of compiling
+the module in question. The recommendation is to disable SHA-512 by
+adding no-sha512 to ./config [or ./Configure] command line. Another
+possible alternative might be to switch to GCC.
+
 [PROG] ========================================================================
 
 * Is OpenSSL thread-safe?
@@ -652,6 +671,17 @@ by:
 Note that debug and release libraries are NOT interchangeable.  If you
 built OpenSSL with /MD your application must use /MD and cannot use /MDd.
 
+As per 0.9.8 the above limitation is eliminated for .DLLs. OpenSSL
+.DLLs compiled with some specific run-time option [we recommend the
+default /MD] can be deployed with application compiled with different
+option or even different compiler. But there is a catch! Instead of
+re-compiling OpenSSL toolkit, as you would have to with prior versions,
+you have to compile small C snippet with compiler and/or options of
+your choice. The snippet gets installed as
+<install-root>/include/openssl/applink.c and should be either added to
+your project or simply #include-d in one [and only one] of your source
+files. Failure to do either manifests itself as fatal "no
+OPENSSL_Applink" error.
 
 * How do I read or write a DER encoded buffer using the ASN1 functions?