OpenSSL 3.1
-----------
-### Changes between 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 [xx XXX xxxx]
+### Changes between 3.1.4 and 3.1.5 [xx XXX xxxx]
+
+ * Fix excessive time spent in DH check / generation with large Q parameter
+ value.
+
+ Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to generate an
+ X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use
+ DH_check_pub_key(), DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check()
+ to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may experience long delays.
+ Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from
+ an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.
+
+ ([CVE-2023-5678])
+
+ *Richard Levitte*
+
+### Changes between 3.1.3 and 3.1.4 [24 Oct 2023]
+
+ * Fix incorrect key and IV resizing issues when calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(),
+ EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() with OSSL_PARAM parameters
+ that alter the key or IV length ([CVE-2023-5363]).
+
+ *Paul Dale*
+
+### Changes between 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 [19 Sep 2023]
+
+ * Fix POLY1305 MAC implementation corrupting XMM registers on Windows.
+
+ The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL
+ does not save the contents of non-volatile XMM registers on Windows 64
+ platform when calculating the MAC of data larger than 64 bytes. Before
+ returning to the caller all the XMM registers are set to zero rather than
+ restoring their previous content. The vulnerable code is used only on newer
+ x86_64 processors supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions.
+
+ The consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can
+ be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not
+ depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst
+ consequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the
+ application process. However given the contents of the registers are just
+ zeroized so the attacker cannot put arbitrary values inside, the most likely
+ consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some application
+ dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service.
+
+ ([CVE-2023-4807])
+
+ *Bernd Edlinger*
+
+### Changes between 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 [1 Aug 2023]
+
+ * Fix excessive time spent checking DH q parameter value.
+
+ The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After
+ fixing CVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can
+ also trigger an overly long computation during some of these checks.
+ A correct q value, if present, cannot be larger than the modulus p
+ parameter, thus it is unnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger
+ than p.
+
+ If DH_check() is called with such q parameter value,
+ DH_CHECK_INVALID_Q_VALUE return flag is set and the computationally
+ intensive checks are skipped.
+
+ ([CVE-2023-3817])
+
+ *Tomáš Mráz*
+
+ * Fix DH_check() excessive time with over sized modulus.
+
+ The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of
+ those checks confirms that the modulus ("p" parameter) is not too large.
+ Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use
+ a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length.
+
+ However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or
+ parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied
+ modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large.
+
+ A new limit has been added to DH_check of 32,768 bits. Supplying a
+ key/parameters with a modulus over this size will simply cause DH_check() to
+ fail.
+
+ ([CVE-2023-3446])
+
+ *Matt Caswell*
+
+ * Do not ignore empty associated data entries with AES-SIV.
+
+ The AES-SIV algorithm allows for authentication of multiple associated
+ data entries along with the encryption. To authenticate empty data the
+ application has to call `EVP_EncryptUpdate()` (or `EVP_CipherUpdate()`)
+ with NULL pointer as the output buffer and 0 as the input buffer length.
+ The AES-SIV implementation in OpenSSL just returns success for such call
+ instead of performing the associated data authentication operation.
+ The empty data thus will not be authenticated. ([CVE-2023-2975])
+
+ Thanks to Juerg Wullschleger (Google) for discovering the issue.
+
+ The fix changes the authentication tag value and the ciphertext for
+ applications that use empty associated data entries with AES-SIV.
+ To decrypt data encrypted with previous versions of OpenSSL the application
+ has to skip calls to `EVP_DecryptUpdate()` for empty associated data
+ entries.
+
+ *Tomáš Mráz*
* When building with the `enable-fips` option and using the resulting
FIPS provider, TLS 1.2 will, by default, mandate the use of an extended
<!-- Links -->
+[CVE-2023-5678]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-5678
+[CVE-2023-5363]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-5363
+[CVE-2023-4807]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-4807
+[CVE-2023-3817]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-3817
+[CVE-2023-3446]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-3446
+[CVE-2023-2975]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-2975
[RFC 2578 (STD 58), section 3.5]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2578#section-3.5
[CVE-2023-2650]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-2650
[CVE-2023-1255]: https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-1255
projects / openssl.git / blobdiff