# A record of formal votes in reverse chronological order.
#
# To vote, add one of the following entries next to your name:
#
#   [+1]  I vote in favour of the proposal
#   [ 0]  I abstain from the vote
#   [-1]  I vote against the proposal
#
# If you are abstaining, you can indicate a tendency as follows:
#
#   [+0]  I abstain but with a slight lean towards a vote in favour
#   [ 0]  I abstain with no stated preference
#   [-0]  I abstain but with a slight lean towards a vote against
#
# A template for voting (alphabetical by surname) follows.

----------------
topic: .
Proposed by .
Public: yes
opened: 2020-mm-dd
closed: 2020-mm-dd
accepted:  yes/no  (for: X, against: Y, abstained: Z, not voted: T)

  Matt       [  ]
  Mark       [  ]
  Pauli      [  ]
  Viktor     [  ]
  Tim        [  ]
  Richard    [  ]
  Shane      [  ]
  Tomas      [  ]
  Kurt       [  ]
  Matthias   [  ]
  Nicola     [  ]

----------------
topic: Rename OSSL_SERIALIZER / OSSL_DESERIALIZER to OSSL_ENCODER / OSSL_DECODER

       The rationale is that it makes things easier on programmers
       (encode / decode is easier to write than serialize / deserialize),
       and also avoids disputes on what is and isn't serialization.

       Associated issues and PRs: #12455, #12659 and #12660
Proposed by Richard
Public: yes
opened: 2020-08-18
closed: 2020-08-20
accepted:  yes  (for: 5, against: 1, abstained: 4, not voted: 1)

  Matt       [ 0]
  Mark       [ 0]
  Pauli      [+1]
  Viktor     [  ]
  Tim        [-1]
  Richard    [+1]
  Shane      [-0]       # Shane's vote was actually --0
  Tomas      [+1]
  Kurt       [ 0]
  Matthias   [+1]
  Nicola     [+1]

----------------
topic: Rename OPENSSL_CTX to OSSL_LIB_CTX (as proposed by pull request #12621)

       The main rationale behind this change is consistency, because many of the new
       OpenSSL 3.0 types have an OSSL_ prefix, and OPENSSL_CTX is a notable exception.
       More details can be found in the description and thread of pull request #12621.

       There was a discussion on openssl-committers ('Rename OPENSSL_CTX to OSSL_WHAT?')
       and an initial poll on doodle about the favourite replacements for OPENSSL_CTX
       (https://doodle.com/poll/drku9ziwvkp6tw25).

Proposed by Matthias  St. Pierre
Public: yes
opened: 2020-08-18
closed: 2020-08-20
accepted:  yes  (for: 5, against: 0, abstained: 4, not voted: 2)

  Matt       [ 0]
  Mark       [  ]
  Pauli      [+1]
  Viktor     [  ]
  Tim        [-0]
  Richard    [-0]
  Shane      [+1]
  Tomas      [+1]
  Kurt       [ 0]
  Matthias   [+1]
  Nicola     [+1]

----------------
topic: For change requests which target both the master and the
       OpenSSL_1_1_1-stable branch, the following procedure should be followed:
       - First, a pull request needs to be opened against the master branch for
       discussion. Only after that pull request has received the necessary
       amount of approvals, a separate pull request can be opened  against the
       OpenSSL_1_1_1-stable branch.
       - A separate pull request against the OpenSSL_1_1_1-stable branch is
       required. This holds - contrary to common practice - even if the change
       can be cherry-picked without conflicts from the master branch. The only
       exception from this rule are changes which are considered 'CLA: trivial',
       like e.g. typographical fixes.
Proposed by Matt Caswell
Public: yes
opened: 2020-06-02
closed: 2020-06-16
accepted:  no  (for: 4, against: 4, abstained: 3, not voted: 0)

  Matt       [ 0]
  Mark       [ 0]
  Pauli      [-1]
  Viktor     [+1]
  Tim        [+1]
  Richard    [-1]
  Shane      [ 0]
  Tomas      [-1]
  Kurt       [-1]
  Matthias   [+1]
  Nicola     [+1]


----------------
topic: Accept and merge #11577.
comment: #11577 reduces the maximum length of TLS labels.
         It also breaks standards compliance.
Proposed by Paul.
Public: yes
opened: 2020-06-02
closed: 2020-06-03
accepted:  no  (for: 0, against: 9, abstained: 1, not voted: 1)

  Matt       [-1]
  Mark       [-1]
  Pauli      [-1]
  Viktor     [  ]
  Tim        [-1]
  Richard    [-1]
  Shane      [-1]
  Tomas      [-1]
  Kurt       [-1]   # 2020-06-09
  Matthias   [ 0]
  Nicola     [-1]

----------------
topic: Keep FIPS_mode() as emulated by EVP_default_properties_is_fips_enabled(NULL)
Proposed by Tomas Mraz
Public: yes
opened: 2020-04-09
closed: 2020-04-27
accepted:  no  (for: 2, against: 5, abstained: 3, not voted: 1)

  Matt       [+1]
  Mark       [ 0]
  Pauli      [-1]
  Viktor     [  ]
  Tim        [-1]
  Richard    [ 0]
  Shane      [-1]
  Tomas      [+1]
  Kurt       [ 0]
  Matthias   [-1]
  Nicola     [-1]

----------------
topic: approve PR#8300 statem: fix the alert sent for too large messages
Proposed by Tim Hudson
Public: yes
opened: 2020-01-16
closed: 2020-01-30
accepted:  no  (for: 1, against: 4, abstained: 6, not voted: 0)

  Matt       [-1]
  Mark       [ 0]
  Pauli      [-1]
  Viktor     [-1]
  Tim        [+1]
  Richard    [ 0]
  Shane      [-0]
  Tomas      [+0]
  Kurt       [ 0]
  Matthias   [-1]
  Nicola     [ 0]