From ba93fd6a383ad609657b42e9302826f48f0d9f6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Ulf=20M=C3=B6ller?= Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:00:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] autoconf would be useful... --- FAQ | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ index ab74287977..5f41736a3f 100644 --- a/FAQ +++ b/FAQ @@ -116,12 +116,8 @@ A number of Linux and *BSD distributions include OpenSSL. * Why aren't tools like 'autoconf' and 'libtool' used? -autoconf is a nice tool, but is unfortunately very Unix-centric. -Although one can come up with solution to have ports keep in track, -there's also some work needed for that, and can be quite painful at -times. If there was a 'autoconf'-like tool that generated perl -scripts or something similarly general, it would probably be used -in OpenSSL much earlier. +autoconf will probably be used in future OpenSSL versions. If it was +less Unix-centric, it might have been used much earlier. libtool has repeatadly been reported by some members of the OpenSSL development and others to be a pain to use. So far, those in the -- 2.34.1