From: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 09:44:13 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: Fix a possible recursion in SSLfatal handling
X-Git-Tag: openssl-3.0.0-alpha1~3126
X-Git-Url: https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=6839a7a7f4973a3fc2f87b12664c26d524bef1f4

Fix a possible recursion in SSLfatal handling

Fixes: #7161 (hopefully)

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7175)
---

diff --git a/ssl/statem/statem.c b/ssl/statem/statem.c
index d75f9ea036..f76c0e4803 100644
--- a/ssl/statem/statem.c
+++ b/ssl/statem/statem.c
@@ -118,11 +118,12 @@ void ossl_statem_set_renegotiate(SSL *s)
 void ossl_statem_fatal(SSL *s, int al, int func, int reason, const char *file,
                        int line)
 {
+    ERR_put_error(ERR_LIB_SSL, func, reason, file, line);
     /* We shouldn't call SSLfatal() twice. Once is enough */
-    assert(s->statem.state != MSG_FLOW_ERROR);
+    if (s->statem.in_init && s->statem.state == MSG_FLOW_ERROR)
+      return;
     s->statem.in_init = 1;
     s->statem.state = MSG_FLOW_ERROR;
-    ERR_put_error(ERR_LIB_SSL, func, reason, file, line);
     if (al != SSL_AD_NO_ALERT
             && s->statem.enc_write_state != ENC_WRITE_STATE_INVALID)
         ssl3_send_alert(s, SSL3_AL_FATAL, al);