# achieves respectful 432MBps on 2.8GHz processor now. For reference.
# If executed on Xeon, current RC4_CHAR code-path is 2.7x faster than
# RC4_INT code-path. While if executed on Opteron, it's only 25%
# achieves respectful 432MBps on 2.8GHz processor now. For reference.
# If executed on Xeon, current RC4_CHAR code-path is 2.7x faster than
# RC4_INT code-path. While if executed on Opteron, it's only 25%
-# slower slower than the RC4_INT one [meaning that if detecting CPU
-# is not desired, then RC4_CHAR code-path should be preferred, as it
-# provides better *all-round* performance].
+# slower than the RC4_INT one [meaning that if CPU ยต-arch detection
+# is not implemented, then this final RC4_CHAR code-path should be
+# preferred, as it provides better *all-round* performance].