X-Git-Url: https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=FAQ;h=9998821fde12033a773c4391783afc1b1166c867;hp=ec7a22242acbe0c1bd648c7f73e6df1ca3f65e02;hb=b1697f189b7b42e7165210d778625461162ad5f0;hpb=c4da6dd38a7d7bd17957078174384b65a764a6c0

diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
index ec7a22242a..9998821fde 100644
--- a/FAQ
+++ b/FAQ
@@ -36,10 +36,13 @@ OpenSSL  -  Frequently Asked Questions
 * Why does the linker complain about undefined symbols?
 * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: command not found"?
 * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented"?
+* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: stack empty"?
 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Alpha Tru64 Unix?
 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail with "ar: command not found"?
 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Win32 with VC++?
 * What is special about OpenSSL on Redhat?
+* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on MacOS X?
+* Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail on MacOS X?
 
 [PROG] Questions about programming with OpenSSL
 
@@ -62,7 +65,7 @@ OpenSSL  -  Frequently Asked Questions
 * Which is the current version of OpenSSL?
 
 The current version is available from <URL: http://www.openssl.org>.
-OpenSSL 0.9.6d was released on May 9, 2002.
+OpenSSL 0.9.6g was released on August 9, 2002.
 
 In addition to the current stable release, you can also access daily
 snapshots of the OpenSSL development version at <URL:
@@ -223,6 +226,8 @@ support can be found at
   http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsrdb/27606&zone_32=SUNWski
 However, be warned that /dev/random is usually a blocking device, which
 may have some effects on OpenSSL.
+A third party /dev/random solution for Solaris is available at
+  http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~andi/
 
 
 * Why do I get an "unable to write 'random state'" error message?
@@ -400,6 +405,17 @@ and compile/install it.  GNU bc (see http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html
 for download instructions) can be safely used, for example.
 
 
+* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: stack empty"?
+
+On some DG/ux versions, bc seems to have a too small stack for calculations
+that the OpenSSL bntest throws at it.  This gets triggered when you run the
+test suite (using "make test").  The message returned is "bc: stack empty".
+
+The best way to deal with this is to find another implementation of bc
+and compile/install it.  GNU bc (see http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html
+for download instructions) can be safely used, for example.
+
+
 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Alpha Tru64 Unix?
 
 On some Alpha installations running Tru64 Unix and Compaq C, the compilation
@@ -466,18 +482,10 @@ and the changes are only valid for the current DOS session.
 
 * What is special about OpenSSL on Redhat?
 
-Red Hat Linux 7.0 and following versions already have a limited version of
-openssl already installed. This may well apply to other Linux distributions
-also. This version does not have support for the IDEA, RC5 and MDC-2
-algorithms as these are patented within the United States. For information
-these patent numbers and expiry dates are:
-
-MDC-2: 4,908,861 13/03/2007
-IDEA:  5,214,703 25/05/2010
-RC5:   5,724,428 03/03/2015
-
-However, Europeans and other non-Americans may wish to install all the
-features.
+Red Hat Linux (release 7.0 and later) include a preinstalled limited
+version of OpenSSL. For patent reasons, support for IDEA, RC5 and MDC2
+is disabled in this version. The same may apply to other Linux distributions.
+Users may therefore wish to install more or all of the features left out.
 
 To do this you MUST ensure that you do not overwrite the openssl that is in
 /usr/bin on your Red Hat machine. Several packages depend on this file,
@@ -499,6 +507,37 @@ relevant updates in packages up to and including 0.9.6b.
 A possible way around this is to persuade Red Hat to produce a non-US
 version of Red Hat Linux.
 
+FYI: Patent numbers and expiry dates of US patents:
+MDC-2: 4,908,861 13/03/2007
+IDEA:  5,214,703 25/05/2010
+RC5:   5,724,428 03/03/2015
+
+
+* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on MacOS X?
+
+If the failure happens when trying to build the "openssl" binary, with
+a large number of undefined symbols, it's very probable that you have
+OpenSSL 0.9.6b delivered with the operating system (you can find out by
+running '/usr/bin/openssl version') and that you were trying to build
+OpenSSL 0.9.7 or newer.  The problem is that the loader ('ld') in
+MacOS X has a misfeature that's quite difficult to go around.
+Look in the file PROBLEMS for a more detailed explanation and for possible
+solutions.
+
+
+* Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail on MacOS X?
+
+If the failure happens when running 'make test' and the RC4 test fails,
+it's very probable that you have OpenSSL 0.9.6b delivered with the
+operating system (you can find out by running '/usr/bin/openssl version')
+and that you were trying to build OpenSSL 0.9.6d.  The problem is that
+the loader ('ld') in MacOS X has a misfeature that's quite difficult to
+go around and has linked the programs "openssl" and the test programs
+with /usr/lib/libcrypto.dylib and /usr/lib/libssl.dylib instead of the
+libraries you just built.
+Look in the file PROBLEMS for a more detailed explanation and for possible
+solutions.
+
 [PROG] ========================================================================
 
 * Is OpenSSL thread-safe?