Skylake performance results.

[openssl.git] / crypto / modes / asm / aesni-gcm-x86_64.pl

diff --git a/crypto/modes/asm/aesni-gcm-x86_64.pl b/crypto/modes/asm/aesni-gcm-x86_64.pl
index 7e4e04ea25300d2bae95694110773cb5d8d359f3..608c3f780577db0185a234048ee0bd4c78c648bc 100644 (file)
--- a/crypto/modes/asm/aesni-gcm-x86_64.pl
+++ b/crypto/modes/asm/aesni-gcm-x86_64.pl
@@ -22,10 +22,11 @@
 # [1] and [2], with MOVBE twist suggested by Ilya Albrekht and Max
 # Locktyukhin of Intel Corp. who verified that it reduces shuffles
 # pressure with notable relative improvement, achieving 1.0 cycle per
-# byte processed with 128-bit key on Haswell processor, and 0.74 -
-# on Broadwell. [Mentioned results are raw profiled measurements for
-# favourable packet size, one divisible by 96. Applications using the
-# EVP interface will observe a few percent worse performance.]
+# byte processed with 128-bit key on Haswell processor, 0.74 - on
+# Broadwell, 0.63 - on Skylake... [Mentioned results are raw profiled
+# measurements for favourable packet size, one divisible by 96.
+# Applications using the EVP interface will observe a few percent
+# worse performance.]
 #
 # [1] http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2900&user=guest&pass=guest
 # [2] http://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/software-support/enabling-high-performance-gcm.pdf