A few more systems reported successfull.

[openssl.git] / STATUS

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index db5425f26912fb123902117cf185d7d28cf21367..e503375d49cc71a3784eff0b4dfba51c32e59208 100644 (file)
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -1,10 +1,34 @@
 
   OpenSSL STATUS                           Last modified at
-  ______________                           $Date: 2000/02/28 12:11:37 $
+  ______________                           $Date: 2000/09/12 22:19:41 $
 
   DEVELOPMENT STATE
 
-    o  OpenSSL 0.9.6:  Under development...
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.6:  Under development (in release cycle)...
+                       Proposed release date September 24, 2000
+                       0.9.6-beta1 is available:
+                       OpenBSD-x86 2.7                 - failed (ftime/TIMEB)
+                                                                [FIXED]
+                       hpux-parisc-cc 10.20            - passed
+                       hpux-parisc-gcc 10.20           - passed
+                       hpux-gcc                        - passed
+                       hpux-brokengcc                  - failed (BN_sqr)
+                       linux-elf                       - passed
+                       linux-sparcv7                   - passed
+                       linux-ppc                       - passed
+                       Solaris [engine]                - failed (speed cswift)
+                                                                [FIXED]
+                       solaris-sparcv8-gcc             - passed
+                       solaris-sparcv9-gcc             - passed
+                       solaris-sparcv9-cc              - passed
+                       solaris64-sparcv9-cc            - passed
+                       sco5-gcc                        - passed
+                       sco5-cc                         - passed
+                       FreeBSD                         - passed
+                       Win32                           - failed (PCURSORINFO)
+                                  RAND_poll() problem on Win2000
+                       aix-gcc (AIX 4.3.2)             - passed
+    o  OpenSSL 0.9.5a: Released on April     1st, 2000
     o  OpenSSL 0.9.5:  Released on February 28th, 2000
     o  OpenSSL 0.9.4:  Released on August   09th, 1999
     o  OpenSSL 0.9.3a: Released on May      29th, 1999
@@ -16,17 +40,24 @@
 
   AVAILABLE PATCHES
 
-    o shared libraries <behnke@trustcenter.de>
     o CA.pl patch (Damien Miller)
 
   IN PROGRESS
 
     o Steve is currently working on (in no particular order):
+        ASN1 code redesign, butchery, replacement.
+        EVP cipher enhancement.
         Proper (or at least usable) certificate chain verification.
        Private key, certificate and CRL API and implementation.
        Developing and bugfixing PKCS#7 (S/MIME code).
         Various X509 issues: character sets, certificate request extensions.
-       Documentation for the openssl utility.
+    o Geoff and Richard are currently working on:
+       ENGINE (the new code that gives hardware support among others).
+    o Richard is currently working on:
+       UTIL (a new set of library functions to support some higher level
+             functionality that is currently missing).
+       Dynamic thread-lock support.
+       Shared library support for VMS.
 
   NEEDS PATCH
 
@@ -79,20 +110,6 @@
                to date.
                Paul +1
 
-    o The EVP and ASN1 stuff is a mess. Currently you have one EVP_CIPHER
-      structure for each cipher. This may make sense for things like DES but
-      for variable length ciphers like RC2 and RC4 it is NBG. Need a way to
-      use the EVP interface and set up the cipher parameters. The ASN1 stuff
-      is also foo wrt ciphers whose AlgorithmIdentifier has more than just
-      an IV in it (e.g. RC2, RC5). This also means that EVP_Seal and EVP_Open
-      don't work unless the key length matches the fixed value (some vendors
-      use a key length decided by the size of the RSA encrypted key and expect
-      RC2 to adapt).
-
-    o ERR_error_string(..., buf) does not know how large buf is,
-      there should be ERR_error_string_n(..., buf, bufsize)
-      or similar.
-
   WISHES
 
     o