More information to the important issue of seeding the PRNG

[openssl.git] / FAQ

diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
index e7642707bdcd097406071431bffd49e480af7056..9998821fde12033a773c4391783afc1b1166c867 100644 (file)
--- a/FAQ
+++ b/FAQ
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ OpenSSL  -  Frequently Asked Questions
 * Why does the linker complain about undefined symbols?
 * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: command not found"?
 * Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: 1 no implemented"?
+* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: stack empty"?
 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Alpha Tru64 Unix?
 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail with "ar: command not found"?
 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Win32 with VC++?
@@ -225,6 +226,8 @@ support can be found at
   http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/retrieve.pl?doc=fsrdb/27606&zone_32=SUNWski
 However, be warned that /dev/random is usually a blocking device, which
 may have some effects on OpenSSL.
+A third party /dev/random solution for Solaris is available at
+  http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~andi/
 
 
 * Why do I get an "unable to write 'random state'" error message?
@@ -402,6 +405,17 @@ and compile/install it.  GNU bc (see http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html
 for download instructions) can be safely used, for example.
 
 
+* Why does the OpenSSL test fail with "bc: stack empty"?
+
+On some DG/ux versions, bc seems to have a too small stack for calculations
+that the OpenSSL bntest throws at it.  This gets triggered when you run the
+test suite (using "make test").  The message returned is "bc: stack empty".
+
+The best way to deal with this is to find another implementation of bc
+and compile/install it.  GNU bc (see http://www.gnu.org/software/software.html
+for download instructions) can be safely used, for example.
+
+
 * Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail on Alpha Tru64 Unix?
 
 On some Alpha installations running Tru64 Unix and Compaq C, the compilation