* Why does my browser give a warning about a mismatched hostname?
* How do I install a CA certificate into a browser?
* Why is OpenSSL x509 DN output not conformant to RFC2253?
+* What is a "128 bit certificate"? Can I create one with OpenSSL?
+* Why does OpenSSL set the authority key identifier extension incorrectly?
[BUILD] Questions about building and testing OpenSSL
* Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail on MacOS X?
* Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in BN_sqr test [on a 64-bit platform]?
* Why does OpenBSD-i386 build fail on des-586.s with "Unimplemented segment type"?
+* Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in sha512t on x86 CPU?
+* Why does compiler fail to compile sha512.c?
+* Test suite still fails, what to do?
[PROG] Questions about programming with OpenSSL
* Is OpenSSL thread-safe?
* I've compiled a program under Windows and it crashes: why?
* How do I read or write a DER encoded buffer using the ASN1 functions?
+* OpenSSL uses DER but I need BER format: does OpenSSL support BER?
* I've tried using <M_some_evil_pkcs12_macro> and I get errors why?
* I've called <some function> and it fails, why?
* I just get a load of numbers for the error output, what do they mean?
* Can I use OpenSSL's SSL library with non-blocking I/O?
* Why doesn't my server application receive a client certificate?
* Why does compilation fail due to an undefined symbol NID_uniqueIdentifier?
+* I think I've detected a memory leak, is this a bug?
+* Why doesn't a memory BIO work when a file does?
===============================================================================
* Which is the current version of OpenSSL?
The current version is available from <URL: http://www.openssl.org>.
-OpenSSL 0.9.7c was released on September 30, 2003.
+OpenSSL 0.9.8e was released on February 23rd, 2007.
In addition to the current stable release, you can also access daily
snapshots of the OpenSSL development version at <URL:
* Where can I get a compiled version of OpenSSL?
+You can finder pointers to binary distributions in
+http://www.openssl.org/related/binaries.html .
+
Some applications that use OpenSSL are distributed in binary form.
When using such an application, you don't need to install OpenSSL
yourself; the application will include the required parts (e.g. DLLs).
-If you want to install OpenSSL on a Windows system and you don't have
+If you want to build OpenSSL on a Windows system and you don't have
a C compiler, read the "Mingw32" section of INSTALL.W32 for information
on how to obtain and install the free GNU C compiler.
With version 0.9.6 OpenSSL was extended to interface to external crypto
hardware. This was realized in a special release '0.9.6-engine'. With
-version 0.9.7 (not yet released) the changes were merged into the main
-development line, so that the special release is no longer necessary.
+version 0.9.7 the changes were merged into the main development line,
+so that the special release is no longer necessary.
* How do I check the authenticity of the OpenSSL distribution?
md5sum TARBALL | awk '{print $1;}' | cmp - TARBALL.md5
You can check authenticity using pgp or gpg. You need the OpenSSL team
-member public key used to sign it (download it from a key server). Then
+member public key used to sign it (download it from a key server, see a
+list of keys at <URL: http://www.openssl.org/about/>). Then
just do:
pgp TARBALL.asc
property rights, please consult a lawyer. The OpenSSL team does not
offer legal advice.
-You can configure OpenSSL so as not to use RC5 and IDEA by using
- ./config no-rc5 no-idea
+You can configure OpenSSL so as not to use IDEA, MDC2 and RC5 by using
+ ./config no-idea no-mdc2 no-rc5
* Can I use OpenSSL with GPL software?
page of the "openssl x509" commandline tool for details. The old behaviour
has however been left as default for the sake of compatibility.
+* What is a "128 bit certificate"? Can I create one with OpenSSL?
+
+The term "128 bit certificate" is a highly misleading marketing term. It does
+*not* refer to the size of the public key in the certificate! A certificate
+containing a 128 bit RSA key would have negligible security.
+
+There were various other names such as "magic certificates", "SGC
+certificates", "step up certificates" etc.
+
+You can't generally create such a certificate using OpenSSL but there is no
+need to any more. Nowadays web browsers using unrestricted strong encryption
+are generally available.
+
+When there were tight restrictions on the export of strong encryption
+software from the US only weak encryption algorithms could be freely exported
+(initially 40 bit and then 56 bit). It was widely recognised that this was
+inadequate. A relaxation of the rules allowed the use of strong encryption but
+only to an authorised server.
+
+Two slighly different techniques were developed to support this, one used by
+Netscape was called "step up", the other used by MSIE was called "Server Gated
+Cryptography" (SGC). When a browser initially connected to a server it would
+check to see if the certificate contained certain extensions and was issued by
+an authorised authority. If these test succeeded it would reconnect using
+strong encryption.
+
+Only certain (initially one) certificate authorities could issue the
+certificates and they generally cost more than ordinary certificates.
+
+Although OpenSSL can create certificates containing the appropriate extensions
+the certificate would not come from a permitted authority and so would not
+be recognized.
+
+The export laws were later changed to allow almost unrestricted use of strong
+encryption so these certificates are now obsolete.
+
+
+* Why does OpenSSL set the authority key identifier (AKID) extension incorrectly?
+
+It doesn't: this extension is often the cause of confusion.
+
+Consider a certificate chain A->B->C so that A signs B and B signs C. Suppose
+certificate C contains AKID.
+
+The purpose of this extension is to identify the authority certificate B. This
+can be done either by including the subject key identifier of B or its issuer
+name and serial number.
+
+In this latter case because it is identifying certifcate B it must contain the
+issuer name and serial number of B.
+
+It is often wrongly assumed that it should contain the subject name of B. If it
+did this would be redundant information because it would duplicate the issuer
+name of C.
+
+
[BUILD] =======================================================================
* Why does the linker complain about undefined symbols?
level chosen by the configuration process. When the above is done, do the
test and installation and you're set.
+3. Reconfigure the toolkit with no-sha0 option to leave out SHA0. It
+should not be used and is not used in SSL/TLS nor any other recognized
+protocol in either case.
+
* Why does the OpenSSL compilation fail with "ar: command not found"?
remedy should be same. Provided binary is statically linked and should be
working across wider range of *BSD branches, not just OpenBSD.
+* Why does the OpenSSL test suite fail in sha512t on x86 CPU?
+
+If the test program in question fails withs SIGILL, Illegal Instruction
+exception, then you more than likely to run SSE2-capable CPU, such as
+Intel P4, under control of kernel which does not support SSE2
+instruction extentions. See accompanying INSTALL file and
+OPENSSL_ia32cap(3) documentation page for further information.
+
+* Why does compiler fail to compile sha512.c?
+
+OpenSSL SHA-512 implementation depends on compiler support for 64-bit
+integer type. Few elder compilers [ULTRIX cc, SCO compiler to mention a
+couple] lack support for this and therefore are incapable of compiling
+the module in question. The recommendation is to disable SHA-512 by
+adding no-sha512 to ./config [or ./Configure] command line. Another
+possible alternative might be to switch to GCC.
+
+* Test suite still fails, what to do?
+
+Another common reason for failure to complete some particular test is
+simply bad code generated by a buggy component in toolchain or deficiency
+in run-time environment. There are few cases documented in PROBLEMS file,
+consult it for possible workaround before you beat the drum. Even if you
+don't find solution or even mention there, do reserve for possibility of
+a compiler bug. Compiler bugs might appear in rather bizarre ways, they
+never make sense, and tend to emerge when you least expect them. In order
+to identify one, drop optimization level, e.g. by editing CFLAG line in
+top-level Makefile, recompile and re-run the test.
+
[PROG] ========================================================================
* Is OpenSSL thread-safe?
file.
Multi-threaded applications must provide two callback functions to
-OpenSSL. This is described in the threads(3) manpage.
-
+OpenSSL by calling CRYPTO_set_locking_callback() and
+CRYPTO_set_id_callback(). (For OpenSSL 0.9.9 or later, the new
+function CRYPTO_set_idptr_callback() may be used in place of
+CRYPTO_set_id_callback().) This is described in the threads(3)
+manpage.
* I've compiled a program under Windows and it crashes: why?
built. If you are using MS Visual C++ (Studio) this can be changed
by:
-1. Select Settings... from the Project Menu.
-2. Select the C/C++ Tab.
-3. Select "Code Generation from the "Category" drop down list box
-4. Select the Appropriate library (see table below) from the "Use
+ 1. Select Settings... from the Project Menu.
+ 2. Select the C/C++ Tab.
+ 3. Select "Code Generation from the "Category" drop down list box
+ 4. Select the Appropriate library (see table below) from the "Use
run-time library" drop down list box. Perform this step for both
your debug and release versions of your application (look at the
top left of the settings panel to change between the two)
Note that debug and release libraries are NOT interchangeable. If you
built OpenSSL with /MD your application must use /MD and cannot use /MDd.
+As per 0.9.8 the above limitation is eliminated for .DLLs. OpenSSL
+.DLLs compiled with some specific run-time option [we insist on the
+default /MD] can be deployed with application compiled with different
+option or even different compiler. But there is a catch! Instead of
+re-compiling OpenSSL toolkit, as you would have to with prior versions,
+you have to compile small C snippet with compiler and/or options of
+your choice. The snippet gets installed as
+<install-root>/include/openssl/applink.c and should be either added to
+your application project or simply #include-d in one [and only one]
+of your application source files. Failure to link this shim module
+into your application manifests itself as fatal "no OPENSSL_Applink"
+run-time error. An explicit reminder is due that in this situation
+[mixing compiler options] it is as important to add CRYPTO_malloc_init
+prior first call to OpenSSL.
* How do I read or write a DER encoded buffer using the ASN1 functions?
because it no longer points to the same address.
+* OpenSSL uses DER but I need BER format: does OpenSSL support BER?
+
+The short answer is yes, because DER is a special case of BER and OpenSSL
+ASN1 decoders can process BER.
+
+The longer answer is that ASN1 structures can be encoded in a number of
+different ways. One set of ways is the Basic Encoding Rules (BER) with various
+permissible encodings. A restriction of BER is the Distinguished Encoding
+Rules (DER): these uniquely specify how a given structure is encoded.
+
+Therefore, because DER is a special case of BER, DER is an acceptable encoding
+for BER.
+
+
* I've tried using <M_some_evil_pkcs12_macro> and I get errors why?
This usually happens when you try compiling something using the PKCS#12
Change your code to use the new name when compiling against OpenSSL 0.9.7.
+* I think I've detected a memory leak, is this a bug?
+
+In most cases the cause of an apparent memory leak is an OpenSSL internal table
+that is allocated when an application starts up. Since such tables do not grow
+in size over time they are harmless.
+
+These internal tables can be freed up when an application closes using various
+functions. Currently these include following:
+
+Thread-local cleanup functions:
+
+ ERR_remove_state()
+
+Application-global cleanup functions that are aware of usage (and therefore
+thread-safe):
+
+ ENGINE_cleanup() and CONF_modules_unload()
+
+"Brutal" (thread-unsafe) Application-global cleanup functions:
+
+ ERR_free_strings(), EVP_cleanup() and CRYPTO_cleanup_all_ex_data().
+
+
+* Why doesn't a memory BIO work when a file does?
+
+This can occur in several cases for example reading an S/MIME email message.
+The reason is that a memory BIO can do one of two things when all the data
+has been read from it.
+
+The default behaviour is to indicate that no more data is available and that
+the call should be retried, this is to allow the application to fill up the BIO
+again if necessary.
+
+Alternatively it can indicate that no more data is available and that EOF has
+been reached.
+
+If a memory BIO is to behave in the same way as a file this second behaviour
+is needed. This must be done by calling:
+
+ BIO_set_mem_eof_return(bio, 0);
+
+See the manual pages for more details.
+
+
===============================================================================
projects / openssl.git / blobdiff