s390x-gf2m.pl: commentary update (final performance numbers turned to be

higher).

diff --git a/crypto/bn/asm/s390x-gf2m.pl b/crypto/bn/asm/s390x-gf2m.pl
index eb389b323a2188ce249fa43b63700134f31f12b0..cd9f13eca29265fb6d9d02835a67c437b4a6a557 100644 (file)
--- a/crypto/bn/asm/s390x-gf2m.pl
+++ b/crypto/bn/asm/s390x-gf2m.pl
@@ -12,17 +12,18 @@
 # The module implements bn_GF2m_mul_2x2 polynomial multiplication used
 # in bn_gf2m.c. It's kind of low-hanging mechanical port from C for
 # the time being... gcc 4.3 appeared to generate poor code, therefore
-# the effort. The module delivers 55%-90% improvement on haviest ECDSA
-# verify and ECDH benchmarks for 163- and 571-bit keys on z990, and
-# 25%-30% - on z196(*). This is for 64-bit build. In 32-bit "highgprs"
-# case improvement is even higher, for example on z990 it was measured
-# 80%-150%. ECDSA sign is modest 9%-12% faster. Keep in mind that
-# these coefficients are not ones for bn_GF2m_mul_2x2 itself, as not
-# all CPU time is burnt in it...
+# the effort. And indeed, the module delivers 55%-90%(*) improvement
+# on haviest ECDSA verify and ECDH benchmarks for 163- and 571-bit
+# key lengths on z990, 30%-55%(*) - on z10, and 70%-110%(*) - on z196.
+# This is for 64-bit build. In 32-bit "highgprs" case improvement is
+# even higher, for example on z990 it was measured 80%-150%. ECDSA
+# sign is modest 9%-12% faster. Keep in mind that these coefficients
+# are not ones for bn_GF2m_mul_2x2 itself, as not all CPU time is
+# burnt in it...
 #
-# (*)  Though no improvement could be measured if compared to code
-#      generated by gcc 4.1. Keep in mind that z196 is out-of-order
-#      execution core and is better at executing poor code.
+# (*)  gcc 4.1 was observed to deliver better results than gcc 4.3,
+#      so that improvement coefficients can vary from one specific
+#      setup to another.
 
 $flavour = shift;